Combining stress breeding and conservation agriculture to mitigate climate change

Climate change and land degradation affect countries across the world, reducing crop yields and destabilizing food security. Extreme weather events such as El Niño further exacerbate this problem. According to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) such as Malawi are particularly susceptible to these challenges due to high population growth, deforestation and soil erosion. Scientists with the CGIAR Research Program on Maize (MAIZE) are working to use climate smart technologies such as conservation agriculture (CA) and drought-tolerant (DT) maize varieties in conjunction to mitigate climate change and increase yields for vulnerable smallholder farmers.

To respond to the increasing threats of climate variability and declining soil fertility, MAIZE tested improved DT maize varieties in combination with CA in seven districts of Malawi. These efforts were conducted in collaboration with lead center CIMMYT and partners including Malawi’s Ministry of Agriculture and Total LandCare, an NGO working in Malawi, with support from USAID’s Feed the Future program. The trials were set up in a mother and baby trial design including 60 mothers (researcher-managed trials) and 360 babies (farmer-managed trials) across a range of agro-ecologies, farm types and environments.

Benefits of CA under drought (left) compared to conventional planting (right) in Hoya, Lundazi District, eastern Zambia.

Despite a strong El Niño in 2016 that left more than half of Malawi's population in need of food relief, farmers experienced a great response from CA systems and DT maize varieties. The best DT variety (Peacock 10) planted under CA demonstrated 66 percent higher yields in comparison with the best non-DT commercial variety (DKC80-53). This shows that a joint promotion of both of these climate-smart technologies, CA and DT maize varieties, can reap the benefit of both approaches as they are mutually re-enforcing.

Farmers were able to harvest comparably more maize than their peers in the 2016 cropping season while also spending 35-45 less labor days in the CA systems, where direct seeding was practiced, as compared to preparing conventional ridging and applying traditional weed control strategies. These multiple benefits preferentially benefit women and children who are usually tasked for this backbreaking work. Nepiyala Thope, a farmer from Chinguluwe, a small village in Central Malawi, appreciated the time she saved with CA. “We spend less time on the CA fields and use this time to expand our land area, relax at home, look after our children and make doughnuts to sell in the market and earn extra income. All of this benefits our households,” Thope said.

A farmer from Balaka poses with a high performing drought tolerant maize variety.

MAIZE’s work on GxExM, the genotype by environment by management interaction, spans from southern Zimbabwe to southern and central Malawi and eastern Zambia to support farmers with options they need to adapt to climate change. A study by MAIZE scientists published in 2016 on the benefits of CA and DT maize in Mozambique found that direct seeded manual CA treatments out yielded conventional tillage treatments in up to 89 percent of cases on maize. The study also found that improved DT maize varieties out yielded the traditional control variety by 26 to 46 percent (695–1422 kg ha−1) on different tillage treatments, across sites and seasons. In the future, as farmers will have to produce more food on less land in an uncertain climate, sustainable cropping systems and CA must be examined as viable options to improve food security and livelihoods.

Taking the science to the people: Real results

MAIZE researchers published 19 impact assessment studies in 2016. Two groundbreaking studies in Malawi and Zambia highlight win-win scenarios associated with the adoption of improved maize varieties and sustainable agricultural practices (SAPs):

In “Development of Conservation Agriculture (CA) Systems in Malawi: Lessons Learned from 2005 to 2014,” Thierfelder et al. (2016) examine the impact of Conservation agriculture (CA), a combination of SAPs, on maize yields and small farmer incomes over the period 2005 to 2014. The study determined that the adoption of CA out yielded conventional ridge tilled control plots in Mwansambo and Zidyana Districts between 22 and 31 percent, respectively, and increased income by 50 and 83 percent, respectively. This was in part due to the fact that crops were produced with 28-39 less labor days ha-1 compared with the conventional practice. Successful extension of CA systems by Total LandCare, using innovation systems approaches, has led to significant out-scaling of this technology to more than 30,000 farmers on more than 14,000 hectares in Malawi in the last decade and this is expected to increase.

In the second study, “Adoption and Impacts of Sustainable Agricultural Practices on Maize Yields and Incomes: Evidence from Rural Zambia,” Manda et al. (2016) report that SAPs such as CA are essential in mitigating risks from climate change. For example, it was found that when practicing crop rotation and crop diversification (components of CA), farmers are sowing a diverse range of crops that can perform well under a range of environmental conditions and, due to different sowing dates and maturity periods of these crops, harvest produce at different times of year. This reduces the risk of total crop loss if drought strikes. Indeed, the retention of crop residue, another SAP, was found to be a vital factor in “improving the soil and retaining moisture especially in drought prone areas”. The results of the Zambia study clearly suggest that “farmers are adopting these SAPs to reduce the effects of droughts” (Manda et al., 2016). The study goes on to recommend the need for policy interventions that promote the combined adoption of improved maize varieties and SAPs, such as a maize–legume rotation and residue retention, which can boost yields and farm incomes especially among resource poor farmers who cannot afford inorganic fertilizers.

A smallholder farm in Chipata, Zambia that is both nutrient and drought stressed.

Text: Jennifer Johnson

Contributors: Bruno Gerard, Christian Thierfelder

Graphics: Gerardo Mejía

Photos: Christian Thierfelder

Editors: Bianca Beks, Dave Watson

NextPrevious

Report Abuse

If you feel that this video content violates the Adobe Terms of Use, you may report this content by filling out this quick form.

To report a Copyright Violation, please follow Section 17 in the Terms of Use.