IMF credits were stolen by Poroshenko and Lagarde people through Jaresko and PrivatBank Disclosure published by former Minister of Housing and Utilities of Ukraine Aleksey Kucherenko.

IMF credits were stolen by Poroshenko and Lagarde people through Jaresko and PrivatBank

Ukrainian political figure and public official, people’s deputy in Ukrainian parliament of III, V and VI calling, former Minister of Housing and Utilities Aleksey Kucherenko writes about this on his Facebook page:

“I am just quoting. And I cannot say that I am surprised. However, if it is not true, let them pursue the publishers in court. In any case – relations with IMF cannot be backroom!

“Auditors found the “chain” by which IMF money was transferred by the National Bank of Ukraine under various “economic” excuses to the nationalized PrivatBank accounts. And from PrivatBank the international millions were leaving in several directions. As a result of the audit it was found out that the money was received by straw men from the team of the President of Ukraine Petr Poroshenko and former Minister of Finance Natalie Jaresko.”

Aleksey Kucherenko

By the way, the clowns accusing me of populism should know that the “hole” in the Privat is evaluated up to 180 billion hryvnas” – wrote Kucherenko.

Privat helped Poroshenko to “launder” 30% of loans, 70% were stolen by IMF bureaucracy.

What have auditors found in PrivatBank?

International Monetary Fund (IMF) loans “passed” through nationalized PrivatBank and “settled” on accounts of straw men who lead to the President of Ukraine Petr Poroshenko and former Minister of Finance Natalie Jaresko team.

This became known after the audit of PrivatBank by the international company “Price Waterhouse Coopers”. Officially the information was never disclosed – the President’s people of influence interfered and are now trying to hide the scandal. PrivatBank persistently evades the comments, but has suddenly waived “Price Waterhouse Coopers” services and have already found a more pliable auditor. This has been published by “Minfin” and “Delo” publishers.

PrivatBank annual audit will be conducted by the international company EY. A source in the bank said that the Supervisory Board of the bank had already chosen this company but officially it is still necessary to sign a contract with it. Earlier “Price Waterhouse Coopers” was engaged in PrivatBank audit. However, the National Bank did not like the company’s audit reports”, - the media say.

The National Bank of Ukraine does not comment on the situation, but it became known that the problem concerns assessment of the collateral in PrivatBank. The National Bank believes that “Price Waterhouse Coopers” auditors made wrong conclusions. As a result, the auditors were not simply “fired” but the National Bank insisted on closing down the Ukrainian office of “Price Waterhouse Coopers”.

“We have questions regarding collateral assessment by “Price Waterhouse Coopers” of both PrivatBank and one more operating bank which we cannot name. Almost all their reports, which we saw, contained serious shortcomings due to which they became substandard and unprofessional”, - said the director of the risk management department of the National Bank of Ukraine Igor Budnik.

Under the pressure of the National Bank of Ukraine, the State Property Fund cancelled the “Price Waterhouse Coopers” appraiser certificate; however 6 days later the company was given a new one. But the National Bank of Ukraine has not stopped persecution of the company.

An IMF auditor is going to the National Bank of Ukraine

So, what have the international auditors dug up in PrivatBank? For what reason total “witch hunt” has been started on them? The answers are contained in “Price Waterhouse Coopers” report, but the National Bank of Ukraine does not allow publishing it in Ukraine.

A source in “Price Waterhouse Coopers” says that the audit results were submitted to the American side, which financed Ukrainian loans intended for reforms. According to the source, the auditors discovered misuse of large loans which were transferred to Ukraine (in fact to the National Bank of Ukraine) through the International Monetary Fund.

Auditors found the “chain” by which IMF money was transferred by the National Bank of Ukraine under various “economic” excuses to the nationalized PrivatBank accounts. And from PrivatBank the international millions were leaving in several directions. As a result of the audit it was found out that the money was received by straw men from the team of the President of Ukraine Petr Poroshenko and former Minister of Finance Natalie Jaresko.

Parade of corruptionists.

The International Monetary Fund decided to conduct an audit of the National Bank of Ukraine for misuse of credit tranches. The National Bank of Ukraine does not confirm this information, but does not deny it either.

But many analysts doubt that the audit of the National Bank of Ukraine will take place. Experts who had access to the results of the IMF loan use audit say that only 30% of money intended for the reforms came to Ukraine. And it was these 30% which the country’s leaders “passed” via Privat and hid in their personal accounts.

Where are the remaining 70%? Reportedly, this money never came to Ukraine. They were divided among themselves by structures affiliated with the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund Christine Lagarde, Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland, American diplomat Madeleine Albright. This list contains other well-known names. In fact, most of the loans that were intended for the people of Ukraine had been taken by these persons for themselves as a fee for services of lobbying these loans for our country.

It is obvious that IMF officials who are implicated in the embezzlement of the credit money are not interested in conducting an honest audit of the National Bank. The experts assume that Lagarde will choose “her” company for the audit of the National Bank of Ukraine. It is possible that those auditors will be close to Madeleine Albright.

Can this statement by the Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch in support of Gontareva’s actions be considered as the official position of the US Government?

“The main task of the IMF auditors in Ukraine will be manipulation with documents and facts in such a way as to justify legitimate use of loans by official Kiev. This is a four-handed game. Both National Bank of Ukraine and IMF will do everything to hide facts of corruption before Donald Trump administration”, - the expert comments.

What are the consequences of this international scam for Ukraine? Definitely – very serious. In fact IMF loans were “utilized” by Poroshenko and Lagarde, but it will be the people of Ukraine who will have to return these millions with interest. Because, according to the documents, the money was spent for reforms and fight against corruption.

It is characteristic that all high-ranking thieves try to whiten Russia. They do not hesitate to call black – white, large-scale and widespread corruption – reforms, Russia armed aggression with dozens of thousands of killed and annexation of Crimea – “a helping hand extended to Ukrainians”.

It should be noted that several criminal proceedings were opened against Ms. Lagarde in France. The criminal cases relate to money laundering on a particular large scale.

It can be assumed that part of the IMF's money is now where Jaresko is?

The current IMF loans for Ukraine were frozen for an indefinite period until the audit and clarification of important circumstances.

According to unconfirmed data the tranche was frozen on the demand of USA authorities which suspect Poroshenko, Kononenko, Granovsky and several more Ukrainian top officials of collusion with certain European “partners” with the aim of fund laundering on a particular large scale.

Primary source of the article >>>

Short video on topic

The statement of the former people’s deputy (MP) Alexander Shepelev that the First Vice-Prime Minister Alexander Turchinov and the people’s deputy (MP) of Ukraine Ruslan Lukyanchuk brought offshore and legalized more than 800 million US dollars from the state budget of Ukraine and IMF foreign assistance.

A comment

Taking into consideration that Poroshenko and the gang of pro-Russian politicians led by him are overt henchmen of Putin, behavior of many well-known politicians after the annexation of Crimea and the attack against Ukraine becomes clear. It becomes clear why the assets of the initiators of the attack against Crimea, such as Surkov and Medvedchuk, in foreign banks were not arrested.

It becomes clear why a blind eye was turned to Ukraine overt surrender presented as Minsk agreements. With numerous violations of the Constitution and the laws of Ukraine. With fictitious “representatives” from Ukraine (the same old Medvedchuk, Kuchma, Shufrich and others) who in fact represented interests of Russia. And personally pro-Russian Poroshenko. But Minsk agreements were decorated as “international” agreements involving some European politicians. Was it free? I am sure history will make its estimate of Minsk agreement shame and betrayal, although today many people are shouting that there are “no alternatives”. Are they shouting for free?

Nowadays the people of Ukraine are fighting on two fronts. Against a foreign enemy – Russian occupants whom the Kremlin propaganda persistently calls the “separatists”. And against domestic enemy - the gang of pro-Kremlin collaborators headed by Poroshenko.

Stealing of IMF credit funds is a good reason to arrest assets of the criminals Poroshenko, Turchinov, Granovsky, Kononenko, Avakov, Groisman, Yatsenyuk, Gontareva, Lutsenko, Shokin, Matios, Nasirov, Medvedchuk, Akhmetov, Kuchma, Shufrich, Efremov, Gritsak, Malikov, Nalivaichenko, Khomutynnyk, Levochkin, Boyko, Pinchuk, Geletey, Nasalik, Rozenko and a number of other high-ranking thieves that usurped the power in Ukraine and thus deprive them of the opportunity to finance in cash militia and Security Service of Ukraine that have become secret police. And, particularly I emphasize, to deprive some of these persons of the opportunity to finance Russian occupation army in the occupied territories making profits on smuggling weapons, coal, food, metal, drugs, etc.

Such a measure would save many lives for the patriots of Ukraine and would give a chance at last to start democratic reformations in the structure of public authorities of Ukraine. Needless to say that this is in the interests of the European Community.

Related links:

The amount stolen by the head of the National Bank Gontareva is shocking the imagination (DOCUMENTS) >>>

“Taruta’s brochure”: full text of the document from D.C. >>>

Valeriya Gontareva was accused of lobbying Russian banks, money laundering, relations with ICU and VTB, etc. >>>

Who is actually the power in Ukraine? And why we were on the verge of existence. >>>

Petr Poroshenko is demonstrating “reforms” in Ukraine to Christine Lagarde.
Created By
@Prizrak_opery
Appreciate

Report Abuse

If you feel that this video content violates the Adobe Terms of Use, you may report this content by filling out this quick form.

To report a Copyright Violation, please follow Section 17 in the Terms of Use.