The World According To Henry K


Is climbing Mount Everest worth a risk or not? Climbing Mount Everest is not a worth a risk. It's not worth a risk because of following reasons. First, it is really dangerous. You can die by falling into the void, getting hit by a snowstorm, or by freezing. Second, it takes a lot of time. To acclimatize, it takes about 7 days per camp. It will take total 1 month to just acclimatize, and about 2 days to climb. Lastly, it costs a lot. It costs about $70,000 per person, and you need to spend money on crew, transportation, supplies, etc. These are the reasons why climbing Mount Everest is not a worth a risk.

Question: “Globalization - making the world stronger or weaker?” Globalization makes the world stronger because of the following reasons. First, it connects the world. When countries are trading, they exchange stuff with stuff, or stuff with money. If they are keep doing that, they will be friendly, and keep trading. Second, it spreads thing. If a country is sending some kind of species, and they plant in their land, he kind of species will increase. And also, you don't have to go to certain country to see something.Third, it’s easier to live. If you order something in internet, it just comes to your home. You don't have to go to another country to get your item, which is really useful. This are the reasons why globalization makes world stronger.

Q&A : what makes good citizen? A good citizen is a person who obeys the law of the country.First, You have to show your responsibility. For example, in the classroom, you have to show your responsibility by doing your homework, completing your class work in class, etc. Second, You can also be a good citizen by voting for president, and paying taxes. And you have many rights to do something, for instance, you have freedom of speech, you have authority to participate things, and much more.

It represents U.S. citizen.

What do you think is the most effective style of government and why? I think representative democracy is the most effective style of government because the government gives equal rights to all citizens, and they respect every single person. When you are voting, you can vote for anyone, and your vote counts toward the representatives and they vote for the president. for example, In America, all citizens can vote for representatives, and representatives vote for president. But in China, not everyone can vote. It’s fair to everyone because they gives more money to who worked more.for example, you get more money in representative democracy if you are doctor, but you get less money if you are worker, etc. You earn more money if you are doing harder jobs. These are the reasons why I think democracy is the most effective style of government.

The government paper

What forces work for and against supranational cooperation among nations in the EU? I think centripetal force works for and against supranational cooperation among nations. First, Europe can be wealthier if the countries unite. Since many countries in Europe is rich, they can be wealthier if they combine. Second, Europe will have stronger power than usual. Since many countries have strong power and pretty big land, they can have more power. Third, Everyone can learn different cultures. Every countries can learn different cultures, and they can be united. This are the reasons why I think centripetal force works for and against supranational cooperation.

Europe is united.

Would it be easier to live in Sahara, or Sahel? I think Sahara is easier than sahel to live because of following reasons. First, Sahara had oases. The oases can support a lot of things to human. It can support water, and many other things. Even though Sahel has more rainfall than Sahara, they have long term drought. Second, Sahara has palm trees. Palm trees can support many things to human, too. They can support the place to rest, and the place to grow crops. But in Sahara, almost all lands are marginal land, so the plants won't be able to grow that well. Because of following reasons, I think Sahara is better than Sahel to live.

This is a picture of Sahara.

How might have valuable resources affected the region? The valuable resource affect a region by making them wealthier, and good to live there. The resources like natural gas, and crude oil made them wealthier. even the small countries like Qatar have 101,000$. And other countries like UAE or Bahrain have like 40k$. The resources made them have higher life expectancy. For example, U.A.E had really dry climate at past. But because of oil, they could sell the oil, or use the oil to build a high buildings, and adapt in hot climate by making artifactual river. The valuable resources like oil reserves made southwest and Central Asia wealthier and better.

This is a picture of a machine that finds oil.

Report Abuse

If you feel that this video content violates the Adobe Terms of Use, you may report this content by filling out this quick form.

To report a Copyright Violation, please follow Section 17 in the Terms of Use.