Thomas Jefferson Kassidy King

Marbury Vs. Madison

In the Marbury Vs. Madison, in 1803, the supreme court announced for the first time the principal that a court may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the constitution. William Marbury had been appointed a justice of the peace for the District of Columbia in the left hours of the Adams administration. When James Madison, refused to deliver Marbury's commission, Marbury, joined by three other similarly situated appointees, petitioned for a writ of mandamus compelling delivery of the commissions. Chief Justice John Marshall didn't agree with the petition and refused to issue the writ. He found that the petitioners were entitled to their commissions, he held that the Constitution did not give the Supreme Court the power to issue writs of mandamus. Section 13 of the Judiciary Act provided that such writes might be issued, but that section of the act was inconsistent with the Constitution and was also invalid. The immediate effect of the decision was to deny power to the Court, its long run effect has been to increase the Court's power by setting up the rule that 'it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.'

Judicial Review

In 1803, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, confirms the legal principle of judicial review, the ability of the Supreme Court to limit Congressional power by declaring legislation unconstitutional in the new nation.

Louisiana Purchase

Lewis & Clark Expedition

Zebulon Pike


Leopard Vs. Chesapeake

Embargo Act

Non-Intercourse Act

Report Abuse

If you feel that this video content violates the Adobe Terms of Use, you may report this content by filling out this quick form.

To report a Copyright Violation, please follow Section 17 in the Terms of Use.