Side one:
Miranda was accused of self-incrimination. When he was arrested he wasn't informed of his 5th and 6th amendment rights they used the confession against him.
Side two:
Arizona didn't inform Miranda about his 5th or 6th amendment rights so Miranda confessed and Arizona used the confession against him in court.
Supreme court decision:
Supreme court states, ¨Miranda has become embedded in routine police warnings to the point where the warnings have become parts of our national culture¨
How it affected the laws of the country:
The police are now required to say ¨you have the right to remain silent.¨
How it affected the culture:
People now want more lawyers or attorneys. More lawyers needed to be hired in order to fulfill all the cases.
Works cited:
“Miranda V. Arizona.” Bill of Rights Institute, Arlington VA, 2017, billofrightsinstitute.org/educate/educator-resources/lessons-plans/landmark-supreme-court-cases-elessons/miranda-v-arizona/. Accessed 1 Mar. 2017.
“Miranda V Arizona.” Landmark Cases, Landmark cases, 1966, landmarkcases.org/en/landmark/cases/miranda_v_arizona#Tab=Overview. Accessed 1 Mar. 2017.
Credits:
Created with images by kevin dooley - "Roosevelt Lake, Arizona" • Meta Mourphic - "arizona"