Dredd Scott V. Sandford

During this time the Southern States gained a new law stating that all slaves must be returned to their owners. Dredd Scott who was a slave had been living in a free state and territory (Illinois and Wisconsin) for 10 years and said he was a free man. He sued His owner's wife after his owner died.

His owner did not deny that he was living in Illinois and Wisconsin but didn't believe Scott was a citizen of the United States. He believed Scott still belonged to his family.

Dred Scott

The Supreme Court had to decide 3 things weather he had a standing to sue, second if blacks where entitled to rights a citizen and finally if they could restrict rights of states to decide if they would enter the union as slave or a free state. They decided Dred Scott was not a citizen and he was not a free man.

This case affected the country because it was a major event in the cross road to the Civil War. The Supreme Courts provocative ruling-blacks did not have any rights which white men should respect and rejected to ban slavery within its own borders-frustrated the public opinion in the North.





Created with images by andyrusch - "Old Courthouse" • skeeze - "cannon civil war outdoors"

Made with Adobe Slate

Make your words and images move.

Get Slate

Report Abuse

If you feel that this video content violates the Adobe Terms of Use, you may report this content by filling out this quick form.

To report a Copyright Violation, please follow Section 17 in the Terms of Use.