Agree or disagree
I agree with imperialism only as a means to expand a country's power and land only if its citizens would die without it and not just to expand because the country's leader wants to.
Patriotism and developing majestic power impelled nations to rival others for matchless quality. It's a matter of national pride, esteem and security. Kingdoms looked for a vital region to guarantee access for their naval forces and armed forces the world over. The domain must be shielded and, even better, extended. Political thought processes were regularly activated as reactions to saw dangers to the security or esteem of the supreme power or its subjects abroad.
Majestic governments, as well as privately owned businesses under those legislatures, looked for approaches to boost benefits. Monetary extension requested shoddy work, access to or control of business sectors to offer or purchase items, and common assets, for example, valuable metals and land; governments have taken care of these requests by tribute or by plunder. After the approach of the Industrial Revolution, subordinate settlements frequently gave to European processing plants and markets the crude materials they expected to fabricate items. Royal shippers frequently settled exchanging posts and distribution centers, made transportation framework, and looked for control over vital gag focuses, for example, the Suez Canal in Egypt (which permits water crafts to cut a huge number of miles of travel time amongst Asia and Europe). Supreme powers regularly rivaled each over for the best potential assets, markets, and exchange.