Miranda Versus Arizona

Argument, for Miranda (side one): The police clearly violated Amanda's right to remain silent, and his sixth Amendment right to legal counsel.

Argument, for the officer (side two): The officer should've known his rights and shouldn't have disregarded them.

The Supreme Court Decision: The supreme court agreed, deciding that the police ha not taken proper steps to inform Miranda of his rights.

How it affected the laws of the country: This argument caused the law that officers must state there rights when put into custody.

How it affected the culture of the country: More people are aware of their rights because on TV shows when people are arrested the police state their rights.

Credits:

Created with images by david__jones - "Bill of Rights" • G20Voice - "Police" • Ted Mielczarek - "The Bill of Rights"

Made with Adobe Slate

Make your words and images move.

Get Slate

Report Abuse

If you feel that this video content violates the Adobe Terms of Use, you may report this content by filling out this quick form.

To report a Copyright Violation, please follow Section 17 in the Terms of Use.