An illustrated companion to Chapters 6-10 of The Embrace of Buildings by Lee Hardy
Chapter 6
COMPLETE STREETS
A retail street built for humans: buildings up to the sidewalk, solid street wall, transparency (windows) at the street level, street trees, parallel parking, pedestrian crosswalks. Mainstreet, Gloucester, MA.
A retail street built for cars. Oceans of asphalt; cartoon signage; pedestrian hostile. Arterial in anonymous exurban region, Michigan.
Page 34: "Streets are to the public space of the city what hallways are to the private space of the house. They are our shared corridors...The exterior walls of the buildings that line the street serve as the interior walls of the public hallway." (Cambridge, England)
Squares, Plazas, and Neighborhood Parks
Page 34: Public squares and plazas (and pocket parks) "are associated with certain kinds of activity: catching the sun on a lunch break, strolling with the kids in the fresh air, sitting on a bench to finish the chapter of a book,...meeting friends and associates..." (Pocket park off the 606 elevated trail, Chicago, Illinois)
In public neighborhood parks young families can step out out the isolation of the private backyard and meet others with shared experiences.
The Transect
Page 35-36: "The study of the progression of the built environment from urban center to rural edge...has been captured recently in the theory of the transect."
Division Street, Wicker Park, Chicago.
Page 40: Let the streets support the social life of the city.
The main street of Hamilton, Ontario, converted into a five-lane, one-way highway. Automobile sewer. Pedestrians beware.
A complete street in Amsterdam. Light rail in the center, with travel lanes for cars and bikes on each side, generous sidewalks for pedestrians, trees planted in the parkway.
Chapter 7
THE PUBLIC REALM
The Big Sort
Landslide counties in the general elections
Page 44: "Sequestered by income, deprived of parks, bankrupting Main Street for malls, we no longer rub shoulders with our neighbors, rich and poor, deprived or thriving, that tousled mix of age, race, and experience."–Jane Kay Holtz, Asphalt Nation. Kensington Market, Toronto.
Third Places
Pages 48-49: "Own Your Own Home" & the Red Scare
P. 48: "Growing tensions between industrial workers and industrial owners led to social instability and the threat of radical politics."
P. 48: "Anxious government leaders at the federal level sought to discourage a similar communist takeover by promoting home ownership." Evidently renters are not real Americans.
The dramatic jump in homeownership after 1940 was in good part due to federal programs adopted in the 1930s during the depression era.
NIMBYism
Page 51: Not in My Back Yard. Recently there has been a rise in YIMBYism (Yes in My Back Yard), advocating for more affordable neighborhoods through the addition of mixed-housing types and public transit.
Chapter 8
FUNCTIONAL ZONING
Page 59; "Grand Rapids, Michigan, was one of the first cities to go in for a complete redevelopment of its downtown area..."
Page 60: "On July 15, 1972, someone pushed a button, and the Pruitt-Igoe public housing towers in St. Louis were demolished."
Chapter 9
JANE AND GOLIATH
Chapter 10
FORM-BASED CODES
Pages 77-78: "As the name suggests, form-based codes pay more attention to the form of buildings that to their their use....A form-based code ...will specify the required height of buildings...It will mandate 'build-to' lines...it will require a certain degree of transparency...it will limit the width of buildings..."
Page 78: 'Form-based codes ...are more open to a mix of uses...and to a mix of buildings types within the same area."
Page 79: "Form-based codes will provide sections for various kinds of street types that mandate adequate room and protection for pedestrians, provisions for street trees and sidewalk furnishings, ratios between the width of streets and the height of buildings that line them, and specifications for bike lanes and public transit if appropriate."
Page 79: "Form-based codes are where urban design and architecture meet, and there is no reason to think that the good urbanism need be guaranteed at the expense of good architecture."