I then entered the conversation with a bible verse which opposes @reallytolerant strong pro-life view.
The next tweet @reallytolerant used involved the slippery slope fallacy, as well as the ad hominem (argument against man) fallacy. He brings up life support, sarcastically suggesting we pull the plug on anyone over the age of 85. He is trying to make an analogy between life support and abortion, all the while not responding to the content of the bible verse I tweeted at him. Instead he shrugs off my "use of scripture" and ends both tweets with hash tagging the word fool. This is an attack on me, the party he is arguing against, rather than the actual issue making it an example of the as hominem fallacy.
I know the point of the assignment was to lose the argument, but @reallytolerant stopped responding after this point. I was just trying to get him fired up, but I guess I took it too far.