If the FBI was it’s own business, would this scenario play out differently?
If you walked in a store and broke something valuable, don’t you have to pay for it?
Yes, the law known as “The Tort Law’’ states if you break something, you buy it. The law is mostly known for breaking a valuable in an expensive store usually caused by an accident. However, in this case, The FBI intruded an innocent family’s home, as well as broke things that may be too expensive for that family to repair, on purpose!
According to Off the grid news,”The Orange County (Florida) Sheriff’s SWAT team, working under direction of the FBI, crashed into his home at around 6 a.m. on a Thursday morning in late October, breaking down doors and shattering windows. They also damaged a new $3,000 floor. About 40 law enforcement personnel were involved.” As stated, the family allowed the FBI to come in their house and search for whatever they were looking for.
However, they never said they would break anything especially since they were found not guilty. On top of that, the family obviously cannot afford to buy another new floor after they paid $3,000 dollars for it, so why should the FBI be refusing to pay for it? Is it because the FBI is apart of the government as opposed to being its own business? Since the FBI is apart of the government, when/if they are stating their claim in court, how will the Judge see this? Will he or she be on the FBI’s side because they are apart of the government helping the country?
Wikipedia also states, “A tort, in common law jurisdictions, is a civil wrong that unfairly causes someone else to suffer loss or harm resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the tortious act. The person who commits the act is called a tortfeasor.” How will this event play out in the end?
